Comparison

BackupKit vs Arq

The polished backup standard — but Mac-primary

BackupKit — Windows-native backup, any destination vs Arq — Premium macOS-first backup ($50/yr)

Arq is, by reputation, one of the most polished backup apps ever made. It's been the go-to recommendation for Mac users who want serious backup without enterprise complexity. It also runs on Windows, but the Windows version has historically felt like a port.

BackupKit is built Windows-first, with the same philosophy: encrypted, client-side, any-destination backup. We're not trying to out-Arq Arq on macOS; we're trying to be the equivalent for Windows users.

If you're on macOS and reading this, honestly: pick Arq, you'll be happy. The rest is for Windows users.

BackupKit vs Arq at a glance

Same philosophy, opposite platform priority. If you are on macOS, pick Arq — this page is for Windows users.

Feature comparison between BackupKit and Arq
Capability BackupKit Arq
Runs on Windows macOS and Windows
Designed Windows-first Arq is a macOS app first; the Windows version follows Yes No
Encrypted client-side, vendor cannot decrypt Functionally equivalent — both AES-256 with the password kept by you Yes Yes
Backs up to storage you own Yes Yes
Object-storage breadth Arq adds a few more, such as Storj Partial Yes
Consumer cloud drives BackupKit is broader on Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, pCloud, Box and MEGA Yes Partial

Every row here is argued in full below. If a row looks like it is missing context, it is — the prose is where the trade-off lives.

Platform focus

Arq is a macOS app first and a Windows app second. The Mac version is what gets new features and design polish; the Windows version follows. That's not a knock on the Arq team — they're a small company focused on what their core users want — but it does mean the Windows experience is sometimes a half-step behind.

BackupKit is the opposite: Windows-only, with all design decisions optimized for the Windows desktop convention. The right tradeoff if you're on Windows; the wrong one if you ever switch to a Mac.

Storage destinations

Both tools support essentially the same set of cloud destinations: S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob, Backblaze B2, Wasabi, plus SFTP and local/network drives. Arq adds a few more (Storj, Cloudflare R2 via S3-compatible endpoint, etc.).

BackupKit covers S3/GCS/Azure plus the consumer-grade clouds (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, pCloud, Box, MEGA) and FTP/FTPS/SFTP/WebDAV. Less object-storage focused than Arq, but broader on consumer cloud.

Encryption

Both encrypt client-side with AES-256 before upload. Both let you keep the password yourself (vendor can't decrypt). Functionally equivalent.

UI and workflow

Arq's UI is famously clean — minimal, fast, and gets out of your way. The configuration flow is wizard-like and the backup list is a single readable pane.

BackupKit's UI takes a similar approach: a three-step wizard for setup, a vertical backup list with health status per job, and a one-click restore. Different aesthetic (more Windows-native, less Mac-clean) but the same philosophy of “your eyes shouldn't need to work hard to use this.”

Price

Arq 7 is $50/year for Personal, with no lifetime option since v6. BackupKit is $6/month, $49/year, or $89 lifetime. The yearly prices line up; BackupKit's lifetime is the differentiator if you don't like subscriptions.

Bottom line

Pick Arq if you're on macOS (no question) or if you primarily use a Mac and occasionally touch Windows.

Pick BackupKit if Windows is your primary OS, you want a Windows-first design, or you'd rather pay once for a lifetime license than subscribe annually.

Back up anything, anywhere — today

Encrypted, scheduled, automated backups to storage you already own. Try every feature free for 30 days — no card required.

AES-256 encryption 30-day free trial Windows 10 & 11